Comments on: Are Keynotes and Twitter A Bad Match?

By: Julie Squires

Julie Squires — Fri, 04 Dec 2009 00:09:27 +0000

So glad you asked! Please turn off the live stream behind speakers; it makes me feel like the chameleon who crawled into the crayola box and exploded. So distracting. If you still want the live twitter stream, what about putting it off to the side? Thanks for surfacing the question. Definitely one of the things that needs correcting as the digital age formalizes. Thanks.

By: Peggy Richardson

Peggy Richardson — Wed, 02 Dec 2009 01:13:09 +0000

I seem like the only person that enjoyed having the tweets there. We’ve all seen enough of twitter to filter any negative or silly comments the moment we see them, and I agree that they sometimes sparked additional discussion. I’m a writer at heart, and curious about what’s in people’s heads – the stream was an interesting window, which encouraged me to re-reflect on the speakers’ words. I livetweeted Brogan’s talk, and I hope that my own tweets were providing some with that same opportunity for reflection, rather than a distraction.

By: accurreglenblond

accurreglenblond — Mon, 30 Nov 2009 10:16:00 +0000

I love her blog too!!! She has amazing clothes!! And I want her hair !!!

By: Deb Ng

Deb Ng — Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:22:06 +0000

I enjoy watching the Twitter stream unfold, but that’s the problem. Eventually I’m focused on what’s going on with Twitter – and not the keynote itself. I’m not a good multitasker. Sometimes I even liken it to heckling and talking while the speaker is talking, which is rather rude.

Maybe watching the Twitter stream outside the event so those not in attendance can make up their minds whether or not to go in and watch? This way it doesn’t distract the audience or the speaker.

By: Are Keynotes and Twitter a Bad Match? « bankruptcycreditcarddebtconsolidation

Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:14:38 +0000

[...] Patrick: Great stuff, Deb. You should be proud of your work! It was my pleasure to participate. Patrick; Kevin: Army Vet Talks About Veterans Day Centennial, CO, November 11, 2009 –(PR.com)– The war to end all. …Continue [...]

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:19:20 +0000

Bruno thanks for adding that comment. I am wondering if it might add more to have the stream in another spot outside the audience view for adding to the conversation at a later time. I have talked with people a number of times after the presentation I give that made comments or had questions. I also think it would be good to have screens in the hallways for those not in the same room that might be drawn into the discussion by what they see on screen. The screen itself is not what is adding and I think they made that distinction when it was stated that people can view it on their smart phones and on their laptops. The other speaker I referred to melted down on stage and the back channel didn’t add to the problem but definitely distracted and took part on the discussion. Thanks again for your comment and adding to the discussion here.

By: Bruno Ribeiro

Bruno Ribeiro — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:54:20 +0000

Hi,

I – along with 3 other colleagues – organized an event on web 2.0, social media and future trends last weekend on Portugal and we decided to use a Twitter Wall so that the audience could exchange their views on the spot, so I’ll share our experience.

It was a good idea, although with some rude moments, similar to what happened to Danah Boyd. Some speakers were heavily criticized, sometimes in a rather rude way. It’s not a pretty thing to listen people laughing during your keynote without knowing the reason. From an organizer point of view, we felt we had created a monster: on one hand we were allowing the speakers to be attacked without a mean to defend themselves, on the other we couldn’t censor the stream and it was adding – for the most part of the event – to the discussion.

That was the nasty bit. For the most of the event the interaction was great and some of the speakers joined the discussion. One of the best things, was that on the more boring moments (those happen with any event), a well placed tweet was enough to sparkle an interesting debate. Other great feature was sharing links and examples of what was being talked on stage.

There were distractions, there were nasty moments and rude comments. But overall it was a good experiment. We did a quick poll on Twitter the following day and the majority (speakers that were most attacked included) agreed that it was a positive add-on to the event. People that attended have already criticized other events this week that don’t include a twitter stream.

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:55:45 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by Genuine: RT @blogworld Are Keynotes asnd Twitter A Bad Match? http://bit.ly/3Gf58j...

By: Jean Warner

Jean Warner — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:25:05 +0000

No. I found the Twitter stream hugely distracting at BlogWorld this year. While Chris Brogan was trying to get the audience engaged in service projects, people were posting things like “Ooo, Chris Brogan complimented me on my t-shirt!” or “Where shall we go drink after this?” Turn it off. If you want to watch the Twitter streamt, monitor your laptop or smart phone!

By: Tweets that mention Are Keynotes and Twitter A Bad Match? -- Topsy.com

Tweets that mention Are Keynotes and Twitter A Bad Match? -- Topsy.com — Thu, 19 Nov 2009 00:49:02 +0000

[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Blog World Expo and Blog World Expo, Jim Turner. Jim Turner said: RT @blogworld Are Keynotes asnd Twitter A Bad Match? http://bit.ly/3Gf58j [...]