<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Duncan Riley Accuses Us Of Spamming Him</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/</link>
	<description>Official News Blog of the World&#039;s Largest Social Media Conference &#38; Tradeshow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:11:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plausible Deniability Just Doesn&#39;t Cut It Mr Arrington &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17199</link>
		<dc:creator>Plausible Deniability Just Doesn&#39;t Cut It Mr Arrington &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17199</guid>
		<description>[...] was a little bit of a storm in a teacup just a month ago over a bit of clumsy email marketing, which also involved Techcrunch writer Duncan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a little bit of a storm in a teacup just a month ago over a bit of clumsy email marketing, which also involved Techcrunch writer Duncan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plausible Deniability Just Doesn&#39;t Cut It Mr Arrington &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17200</link>
		<dc:creator>Plausible Deniability Just Doesn&#39;t Cut It Mr Arrington &#124; Andy Beard - Niche Marketing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 17:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17200</guid>
		<description>[...] was a little bit of a storm in a teacup just a month ago over a bit of clumsy email marketing, which also involved Techcrunch writer Duncan [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] was a little bit of a storm in a teacup just a month ago over a bit of clumsy email marketing, which also involved Techcrunch writer Duncan [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Calvert</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17065</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Calvert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17065</guid>
		<description>Apology accepted. Let&#039;s call the whole thing a big misunderstanding. I am not trying to lead any &quot;hate campaign&quot; against you. I don&#039;t know you which is why I couldn&#039;t understand why you would spread rumors about us. 

Again just to be clear I never accused you of lying. Please correct me if I am wrong and show me where I said it.  

I think you and I have a different definition of Spam. The email Outerjoin sent you was not Spam. A real person found your blog, via someone else&#039;s blog roll, or some other means, manually found your contact info, and then sent you an email about an event that is directly related to your interest as a blogger and in fact your profession. They sent this email from their personal email account, signed it with their real name and invited you to reply. 

That&#039;s not Spam. Now the person who did it was ham handed and clumsy absolutely and has since apologized for it. I have also apologized for it. (not something a spammer would do).

The other email in question came from our newsletter. We use a third party service that has strict policies against spam, if we violated those rules (more than 1 complaint per 1000 emails sent) they would suspend our account. They haven&#039;t so again we are not spamming people. 

The newsletter has an opt out option and a spam complaint option. I have no idea how you got on that list, but your email address has been removed now and is in our suppression file. You won&#039;t get any more newsletters from us. 

Those are the facts as I see them and I can let bygones be bygones if you can 8).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apology accepted. Let&#8217;s call the whole thing a big misunderstanding. I am not trying to lead any &#8220;hate campaign&#8221; against you. I don&#8217;t know you which is why I couldn&#8217;t understand why you would spread rumors about us. </p>
<p>Again just to be clear I never accused you of lying. Please correct me if I am wrong and show me where I said it.  </p>
<p>I think you and I have a different definition of Spam. The email Outerjoin sent you was not Spam. A real person found your blog, via someone else&#8217;s blog roll, or some other means, manually found your contact info, and then sent you an email about an event that is directly related to your interest as a blogger and in fact your profession. They sent this email from their personal email account, signed it with their real name and invited you to reply. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not Spam. Now the person who did it was ham handed and clumsy absolutely and has since apologized for it. I have also apologized for it. (not something a spammer would do).</p>
<p>The other email in question came from our newsletter. We use a third party service that has strict policies against spam, if we violated those rules (more than 1 complaint per 1000 emails sent) they would suspend our account. They haven&#8217;t so again we are not spamming people. </p>
<p>The newsletter has an opt out option and a spam complaint option. I have no idea how you got on that list, but your email address has been removed now and is in our suppression file. You won&#8217;t get any more newsletters from us. </p>
<p>Those are the facts as I see them and I can let bygones be bygones if you can 8).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17064</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Oct 2007 04:05:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17064</guid>
		<description>Steve
when I said dropped I meant wasn&#039;t invited: removed from the invite list (ie dropped). At no stage have I suggested (or for that matter am I aware) was I ever going to speak or what not...indeed this is all news to me, unless Steve it is you with the dillusional issues.

As for responsibility I take for responsibility because simply its true. I&#039;ve received two spam emails from people claiming to be representing BlogWorldExpo. I&#039;ve privately been told that these were either (or both) sent in error or by people who shouldn&#039;t have sent them, I had happily accepted that and thought it was the end of the matter, particularly given there is NO public record to correct (and by correct I mean add the response because end of the day the facts are true: I received spam claiming to be from BlogWorldExpo).

Rick
you&#039;ve accused me of lying over the spam which constitutes a personal attack in my country, even if it doesn&#039;t in you.

Having said that given that you feel so strongly about one Tweet amongst thousands I have done, I humbly and sincerely apologise for putting it up. It&#039;s really not that big a deal, so I&#039;ve got no issues at all with apologising over it. Now if only you&#039;d stop accusing me of lying and leading this bizarre hate campaign against me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve<br />
when I said dropped I meant wasn&#8217;t invited: removed from the invite list (ie dropped). At no stage have I suggested (or for that matter am I aware) was I ever going to speak or what not&#8230;indeed this is all news to me, unless Steve it is you with the dillusional issues.</p>
<p>As for responsibility I take for responsibility because simply its true. I&#8217;ve received two spam emails from people claiming to be representing BlogWorldExpo. I&#8217;ve privately been told that these were either (or both) sent in error or by people who shouldn&#8217;t have sent them, I had happily accepted that and thought it was the end of the matter, particularly given there is NO public record to correct (and by correct I mean add the response because end of the day the facts are true: I received spam claiming to be from BlogWorldExpo).</p>
<p>Rick<br />
you&#8217;ve accused me of lying over the spam which constitutes a personal attack in my country, even if it doesn&#8217;t in you.</p>
<p>Having said that given that you feel so strongly about one Tweet amongst thousands I have done, I humbly and sincerely apologise for putting it up. It&#8217;s really not that big a deal, so I&#8217;ve got no issues at all with apologising over it. Now if only you&#8217;d stop accusing me of lying and leading this bizarre hate campaign against me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Did TechCrunch Writer Dis BlogWorld? : Professional Blogging News</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17056</link>
		<dc:creator>Did TechCrunch Writer Dis BlogWorld? : Professional Blogging News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 19:51:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17056</guid>
		<description>[...] rather minor issue has taken on a life of its own, with Calvert  updating his page apologizing to Riley for linking to a scraper ( a site that lifts blog posts wholesale), [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] rather minor issue has taken on a life of its own, with Calvert  updating his page apologizing to Riley for linking to a scraper ( a site that lifts blog posts wholesale), [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve O'Reilly</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17054</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve O'Reilly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 14:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17054</guid>
		<description>Duncan - You really are delusional.  You say you heard a &quot;rumor&quot; on Twitter that your speaking spot had been canceled.  Yet you knew you hadn&#039;t been invited to speak because, well, you hadn&#039;t been invited to speak?  How in the world then is it a &quot;rumor&quot; that your spot had been canceled?

Also, you say &quot;If this was a major issue (which it never was) I would have blogged it: I didn’t and to this date I’ve done nothing more than repeat a rumor someone told me on my Twitter stream that is read by maybe no more than a couple of hundred people, most of whom I know..&quot;

YOU DID BLOG IT ON TECHCRUNCH.COM which is read by nearly a million people via RSS according to their own Feedburner chicklet.  It doesn&#039;t matter that it was taken down - it went into the RSS feed and was read by probably hundreds of thousands of people.

So stop your foolish nonsense of repeating &quot;rumors&quot; and denying the blog post.  Get some accountability and quit hiding under a rock.

You posted it, you wrote it, and now it&#039;s out there.  Deal with it like a mature adult - if you can.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duncan &#8211; You really are delusional.  You say you heard a &#8220;rumor&#8221; on Twitter that your speaking spot had been canceled.  Yet you knew you hadn&#8217;t been invited to speak because, well, you hadn&#8217;t been invited to speak?  How in the world then is it a &#8220;rumor&#8221; that your spot had been canceled?</p>
<p>Also, you say &#8220;If this was a major issue (which it never was) I would have blogged it: I didn’t and to this date I’ve done nothing more than repeat a rumor someone told me on my Twitter stream that is read by maybe no more than a couple of hundred people, most of whom I know..&#8221;</p>
<p>YOU DID BLOG IT ON TECHCRUNCH.COM which is read by nearly a million people via RSS according to their own Feedburner chicklet.  It doesn&#8217;t matter that it was taken down &#8211; it went into the RSS feed and was read by probably hundreds of thousands of people.</p>
<p>So stop your foolish nonsense of repeating &#8220;rumors&#8221; and denying the blog post.  Get some accountability and quit hiding under a rock.</p>
<p>You posted it, you wrote it, and now it&#8217;s out there.  Deal with it like a mature adult &#8211; if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17053</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Oct 2007 01:20:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17053</guid>
		<description>1. never attacked you. 
2. you attacked me at least three times now.  
3. I apologized for anything we may have done to offend you and the actions of our exhibitor and our part in it. 
4. You have yet to apologize for spreading an untrue rumor that you have since learned was false. 
5. I am correcting my error in this post attributing the scraper blog to be yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. never attacked you.<br />
2. you attacked me at least three times now.<br />
3. I apologized for anything we may have done to offend you and the actions of our exhibitor and our part in it.<br />
4. You have yet to apologize for spreading an untrue rumor that you have since learned was false.<br />
5. I am correcting my error in this post attributing the scraper blog to be yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: How Sad: BlogWorldExpo Organizer Blows Up Nothing To Something</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17041</link>
		<dc:creator>How Sad: BlogWorldExpo Organizer Blows Up Nothing To Something</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 01:24:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17041</guid>
		<description>[...] This is verging on downright bizarre. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This is verging on downright bizarre. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17040</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Oct 2007 00:58:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17040</guid>
		<description>Rick
I&#039;m interested to know how exactly I&#039;m suppose to change a post on a spam blog (the one you&#039;ve linked to) which isn&#039;t mine. The post wasn&#039;t interesting enough for TechCrunch and was pulled in less than 5 minutes after going up...so basically there is NOTHING to correct because simply it&#039;s not published at the source.

As for these attacks that I&#039;m some how desperate for attention is bizarre, I write for a publication with a readership in excess of 1 million people with over 600,000 RSS subscribers so I find the commenter attacks odd to say the least, and certainly seem to be motivated by my prior business relationships. There are far, far more important stories in the world and I&#039;ve probably written 50-100 posts since this time, none of which related to your convention, and some of which have been quoted extensively in the mainstream media, including TV.

End of the day I corresponded with a number of people involved with your conference, received apologies and what not and was happy to leave it at that, particularly given that my original post is not live at the source. If anyone is attempting to gain free and cheap publicity it&#039;s you Rick, not me. 

As for the invite stuff on Twitter: I heard rumor, posted it on Twitter, heard from a number of sources that it wasn&#039;t true and left it at that. If this was a major issue (which it never was) I would have blogged it: I didn&#039;t and to this date I&#039;ve done nothing more than repeat a rumor someone told me on my Twitter stream that is read by maybe no more than a couple of hundred people, most of whom I know....and I&#039;d note there has probably been hundreds, if not thousands of tweets after that, none of which were in relation to the rumor, because that&#039;s how little I cared for it. I understand and respect that when you&#039;re involved in an event it&#039;s easy to become rapped up and obsessed by it, but seriously Rick, get a grip and some perspective. It sounds like a great event and unfortunately I can&#039;t attend, but I still wish everybody else the best with it, even if I&#039;m now somewhat hesitant to extend those well wishes to you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick<br />
I&#8217;m interested to know how exactly I&#8217;m suppose to change a post on a spam blog (the one you&#8217;ve linked to) which isn&#8217;t mine. The post wasn&#8217;t interesting enough for TechCrunch and was pulled in less than 5 minutes after going up&#8230;so basically there is NOTHING to correct because simply it&#8217;s not published at the source.</p>
<p>As for these attacks that I&#8217;m some how desperate for attention is bizarre, I write for a publication with a readership in excess of 1 million people with over 600,000 RSS subscribers so I find the commenter attacks odd to say the least, and certainly seem to be motivated by my prior business relationships. There are far, far more important stories in the world and I&#8217;ve probably written 50-100 posts since this time, none of which related to your convention, and some of which have been quoted extensively in the mainstream media, including TV.</p>
<p>End of the day I corresponded with a number of people involved with your conference, received apologies and what not and was happy to leave it at that, particularly given that my original post is not live at the source. If anyone is attempting to gain free and cheap publicity it&#8217;s you Rick, not me. </p>
<p>As for the invite stuff on Twitter: I heard rumor, posted it on Twitter, heard from a number of sources that it wasn&#8217;t true and left it at that. If this was a major issue (which it never was) I would have blogged it: I didn&#8217;t and to this date I&#8217;ve done nothing more than repeat a rumor someone told me on my Twitter stream that is read by maybe no more than a couple of hundred people, most of whom I know&#8230;.and I&#8217;d note there has probably been hundreds, if not thousands of tweets after that, none of which were in relation to the rumor, because that&#8217;s how little I cared for it. I understand and respect that when you&#8217;re involved in an event it&#8217;s easy to become rapped up and obsessed by it, but seriously Rick, get a grip and some perspective. It sounds like a great event and unfortunately I can&#8217;t attend, but I still wish everybody else the best with it, even if I&#8217;m now somewhat hesitant to extend those well wishes to you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://www.blogworld.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/comment-page-1/#comment-17023</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 00:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.blogworldexpo.com/2007/10/17/duncan-riley-accuses-us-of-spamming-him/#comment-17023</guid>
		<description>Barry,

 I will contact you directly to make sure you don&#039;t get any more of those emails. 

TC, 

I don&#039;t really know what you are talking about. Could you elaborate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Barry,</p>
<p> I will contact you directly to make sure you don&#8217;t get any more of those emails. </p>
<p>TC, </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t really know what you are talking about. Could you elaborate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 5/19 queries in 0.010 seconds using apc

Served from: blogworld.com @ 2012-02-09 10:13:54 -->
